On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:16:24 GMT, Abhinay Agarwal <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> The current separation looks good to me too. A question then for both you and @nlisker : Should I split the "Enhancements" section into two groups as shown in the PR Description, or leave it as a single group? > I have a question related to issues to be included: we tend to normally not > include backports in release notes. However, issues like > [JDK-8299738](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8299738) and > [JDK-8335630](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8335630) are included. Are > these included because the backports were successfully made before the > release of `jfx23`? We started including backports as of JavaFX 21 because of the change to integrate fixes first into mainline and use backport-style PRs into the stabilization branch. See [this PR comment](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/1239#discussion_r1323664831) in the JavaFX 21 release notes PR. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1553#issuecomment-2328727260
