On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:00:56 GMT, Marius Hanl <mh...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> good point.
>> 
>> May I suggest to declare constants for column widths and column reordering 
>> coordinates so the origin of these numbers becomes clear?
>> Also, we are comparing floating point numbers, so perhaps it's better 
>> specify a small delta:
>> 
>> double CWIDTH = 100;
>> double EPSILON = 0.0001;
>> assertEquals(CWIDTH + CWIDTH + OFFSET, columnDragHeader.getTranslateX(), 
>> EPSILON);
>
> Pushed. 
> Since we compare very simple numbers (we even set them before as int), I 
> personally would not expect a delta but an accurate number, therefore no 
> delta added in this test.

Will it be a round integer in case of fractional scale (it might be in this 
case, since the test does not set the scale explicitly)?

Should we extends this test with fractional scale, let's say 1.25?

Have you tested this fix with fractional scale?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1292#discussion_r1401151468

Reply via email to