openjdk  

Messages by Thread

• • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Daniel van Vugt
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Daniel van Vugt
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Thorsten Glaser
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Daniel van Vugt
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] Re: In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Daniel van Vugt
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1729558] [NEW] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements Launchpad Bug Tracker
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723759] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT Steve Beattie
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723759] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT Launchpad Bug Tracker
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1721756] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../nouveau/pushbuf.c :727 : nouveau_pushbuf_data: l'assertion « kref » a échoué. Steve Beattie
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721756] Re: java assert failure: java: ../../nouveau/pushbuf.c :727 : nouveau_pushbuf_data: l'assertion « kref » a échoué. Daniel van Vugt
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1729257] [NEW] Terrible Font Selection / Rendering on Artful md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729257] Re: Terrible Font Selection on Artful md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729257] Re: Terrible Font Selection / Rendering on Artful md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729257] Re: Terrible Font Selection / Rendering on Artful md_5
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729257] Re: Terrible Font Selection / Rendering on Artful Tiago Stürmer Daitx
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1729102] [NEW] /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-arm64/jre/bin/java:11:elf_machine_rela_relative:elf_dynamic_do_Rela:_dl_relocate_object:dl_open_worker:_dl_catch_error errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1729102] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-arm64/jre/bin/java:11:elf_machine_rela_relative:elf_dynamic_do_Rela:_dl_relocate_object:dl_open_worker:_dl_catch_error Thorsten Glaser
• [Openjdk] [Bug 981037] Re: The javac executable doesn't produce full paths for files on error Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1111517] Re: javaws doesn't open Supermicro remote console (IP-KVM) Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 199732] Re: applet fails to load with nullpointerexception Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 237001] Re: Java applet not initialized in Firefox 3 RC1 Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 445009] Re: Eclipse SIGSEGVs in libpango Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 659309] Re: Firefox crashes on Fronter Platform Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1006776] Re: openjdk-6-jdk ssl negotiation incompatibility Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1006776] Re: openjdk-6-jdk ssl negotiation incompatibility Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1727609] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() Apport retracing service
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1726895] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in set_para_values() Seth Arnold
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] [NEW] lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 trespasserw
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 trespasserw
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 k463
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Postadal
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1727002] Re: lib/jrt-fs.jar is incompatible with Java 8 Bug Watch Updater
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1726290] [NEW] deb package doesnt install the GA Release of Openjdk 9 Juan
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] [NEW] java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Sebastian Rost
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Apport retracing service
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] Stacktrace.txt Apport retracing service
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] StacktraceSource.txt Apport retracing service
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] ThreadStacktrace.txt Apport retracing service
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Mateusz Bysiek
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1725841] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in WTFCrash() Apport retracing service
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1724600] [NEW] package openjdk-9-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/jmods/java.base.jmod' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/jmods/java.base.jmod.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream arfi
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1724600] Re: package openjdk-9-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/jmods/java.base.jmod' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-i386/jmods/java.base.jmod.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] [NEW] PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] [NEW] PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Frank Heimes
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Manoj Iyer
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Steve Langasek
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Francis Ginther
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Dimitri John Ledkov
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8 Andrew Cloke
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] [NEW] PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] [NEW] PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Frank Heimes
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Manoj Iyer
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Steve Langasek
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Francis Ginther
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Dimitri John Ledkov
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 Andrew Cloke
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] [NEW] PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] [NEW] PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Frank Heimes
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Steve Langasek
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Francis Ginther
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Dimitri John Ledkov
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 Andrew Cloke
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] [NEW] PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 bugproxy
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] [NEW] PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Frank Heimes
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Manoj Iyer
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Steve Langasek
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Francis Ginther
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Dimitri John Ledkov
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8 Andrew Cloke
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723862] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla bugproxy
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] [NEW] dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Laurent Bonnaud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Laurent Bonnaud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Laurent Bonnaud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip sokai
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Laurent Bonnaud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Pushkar
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Pushkar
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Pushkar
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Matthias Klose
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Pushkar
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Laurent Bonnaud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip Thorsten Glaser
• [Openjdk] Bug#878272: openjdk-9: Move the jmod files from openjdk-9-jre-headless to openjdk-9-jdk-headless Emmanuel Bourg
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1722410] [NEW] java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu" Andreas Hasenack
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu" Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu" John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu" Matthias Klose
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu" Launchpad Bug Tracker
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] [NEW] JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Don-vip
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Matthias Klose
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Matthias Klose
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Emmanuel Bourg
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Emmanuel Bourg
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Hans Joachim Desserud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Александр
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Samuel Bühner
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 JPT
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 Tiago Stürmer Daitx
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9 John Neffenger
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1721732] [NEW] Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead Lachezar Dobrev
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead Lachezar Dobrev
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead Matthias Klose
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1721397] [NEW] Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial Don-vip
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial Hans Joachim Desserud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial Dan Streetman
• Re: [Openjdk] Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available Mattia Rizzolo
  • [Openjdk] Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available Olliver Schinagl
  • [Openjdk] Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available Matthias Klose
  • [Openjdk] Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available Olliver Schinagl
• [Openjdk] Bug#877523: openjdk-9 FTBFS with debhelper 10.9 Adrian Bunk
• [Openjdk] Bug#876545: src.zip is placed in a wrong directory Evgeny Kapun
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1718934] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt Sergio Baronetti
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1718934] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt dino99
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Stefan Wahren
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Brian Murray
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Stefan Wahren
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Tiago Stürmer Daitx
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Stefan Wahren
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Stefan Wahren
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Stefan Wahren
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package" Launchpad Bug Tracker
• [Openjdk] Bug#876051: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield Ben Hutchings
  • [Openjdk] Bug#876069: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield Philip Hands
• [Openjdk] Bug#874555: openjdk-7: version in wheezy-lts is newer than anything else Andreas Beckmann
• [Openjdk] Bug#874434: openjdk-8-jre-headless: uninstallable on armhf Gianfranco Costamagna
  • [Openjdk] Bug#874434: (no subject) Gianfranco Costamagna
• [Openjdk] Bug#874292: openjdk-9: Please re-enable Zero builds for Hotspot archs John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• [Openjdk] Bug#874265: openjdk-9: Please update zero-sparc.diff with version from upstream John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] [NEW] OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Jan Rüegg
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Hans Joachim Desserud
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Tiago Stürmer Daitx
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Jan Rüegg
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Jan Rüegg
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Launchpad Bug Tracker
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Harel Mazor
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Leagnus
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Bug Watch Updater
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Eduard Braun
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Norbert
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Launchpad Bug Tracker
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Bryce Harrington
  • Re: [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts krama
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Jean-
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Jean-
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Tiago Stürmer Daitx
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts Tiago Stürmer Daitx
• [Openjdk] Bug#873254: classes.jsa is not removed on package uninstall Evgeny Kapun
• [Openjdk] [Bug 1713043] [NEW] openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install Demitrius Belai
  • [Openjdk] [Bug 1713043] Re: openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install Matthias Klose
• [Openjdk] Bug#873154: dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/etc/java-9-openjdk': Directory not empty 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
• [Openjdk] Bug#873153: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages