> On 15. Dec 2024, at 15:43, Jean-Pierre André via openindiana-discuss > <openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote: > > Marcel Telka wrote on 12/15/24 1:51 PM: >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:57:22AM +0100, Jean-Pierre André via >> openindiana-discuss wrote: >>> I however see that /usr/kernel/fs/amd64/pcfs and >>> /usr/kernel/fs/amd64/fdfs which also have to index into >>> the vfssw table still do so assuming this is an array of >>> 128 bytes records. I do not know which package provides >>> these files. >> $ pkg search /usr/kernel/fs/amd64/pcfs >> INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE >> path file usr/kernel/fs/amd64/pcfs pkg:/SUNWcs@0.5.11-2024.0.0.22463 >> $ pkg search /usr/kernel/fs/amd64/fdfs >> INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE >> path file usr/kernel/fs/amd64/fdfs pkg:/SUNWcs@0.5.11-2024.0.0.22463 >> $ >> HTH > > Sorry, I am lost. > > The newly updated fuse module still index vfssw by steps of 128. > When I compile it myself, this is by steps of 136. > > I had better think it over again. > > Jean-Pierre
root@beastie:/code/illumos-gate# mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic uppc apix scsi_vhci zfs sata sd cpc ip hook neti sockfs arp usba i915 xhci s1394 stmf stmf_sbd mm lofs idm crypto random nfs klmmod fcip fctl vmm ufs logindmux ptm smbsrv sppp ] > ::sizeof vfs vfs_feature_t vfs_impl_t vfs_t vfs_ufsfx_t vfsdef_t vfsdef_v5 vfsops_t vfssw_t > ::sizeof vfssw_t sizeof (vfssw_t) = 0x88 > Thats 136 bytes. This check is done on current HEAD of illumos-gate. rgds, toomas _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
