On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:36:52AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:21:16AM +0100, Stephan Althaus wrote: > > On 11/9/22 10:15, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:44:58AM +0100, Stephan Althaus wrote: > > > > Yesterday i tried to use nvidia driver version 515 with my M1200M, > > > > but got an error in the Xorg.0.log: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 234.097] (II) Loading sub module "glxserver_nvidia" > > > > [ 234.097] (II) LoadModule: "glxserver_nvidia" > > > > [ 234.098] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module glxserver_nvidia > > > > [ 234.098] (II) UnloadModule: "glxserver_nvidia" > > > > [ 234.098] (II) Unloading glxserver_nvidia > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to load module "glxserver_nvidia" > > > > (module > > > > does not exist, 0) > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please > > > > check in your X > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been > > > > loaded in your X > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the > > > > NVIDIA > > > > GLX module. If > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): you continue to encounter problems, > > > > Please > > > > try > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): reinstalling the NVIDIA driver. > > > > [ 234.098] (II) NVIDIA: The X server does not support PRIME Render > > > > Offload. > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(GPU-0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA > > > > graphics > > > > device! > > > > [ 234.098] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failing initialization of X screen > > > > [ 234.098] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia" > > > > > > > > i do not find glxserver_nvidia in the running version 470: > > > > > > > > $ grep -i glx /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > > > [ 90.930] (II) LoadModule: "glx" > > > > [ 90.932] (II) Loading > > > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so > > > > [ 90.986] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" > > > > [ 90.986] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 470.141.03 Thu Jun 30 18:38:53 UTC > > > > 2022 > > > > [ 93.742] (II) Initializing extension GLX > > > > [ 93.742] (II) Indirect GLX disabled. > > > > > > > > Does anyone has a hint on how to solve this? > > > There is no '*glxserver_nvidia*' file in the Solaris driver distribution > > > https://us.download.nvidia.com/solaris/515.76/NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-515.76.run > > > so I'm not sure why they expect such file (module) to exist. Maybe this > > > is a bug in their package? Either they forgot to add the module into > > > the package, or they mistakenly require it when they shouldn't? Maybe > > > you could try to contact NVIDIA. > > Looking a bit around i think its the GLX module that is not "NVIDIA" > > > > [ 234.053] (II) LoadModule: "glx" > > [ 234.055] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so > > [ 234.071] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > > [ 234.071] compiled for 1.19.7, module version = 1.0.0 > > [ 234.071] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 10.0 > > Is the log with nvidia-470 (470.141.3) or nvidia (515.76)? > > If it is with nvidia-470, and if for nvidia 515.76 the > /usr/X11/lib/modules/extensions/NVIDIA/amd64/libglx.so is loaded > instead, then that would explain why they need glxserver_nvidia. > > > and the glxserver is a method within that or something similar.. > > > > How to configure Xorg to use a different path for the GLX module is the next > > question to solve.. > > As a quick test you could try to remove > /usr/X11/lib/modules/extensions/NVIDIA/amd64/libglx.so and see what > happens. If it solves the problem we could remove it from package.
Ah, Udo is right. Please ignore what I said above. Almost all libglx.so are just symlinks, not real files. -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: mar...@telka.sk | | homepage: http://telka.sk/ | +-------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
