On 10/26/15 08:21 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 10/24/2015 12:59, Nikola M wrote:
I also never understood reasons to change path for g++. Could it be put
some light on that, too?
Hi.
The reason to have /usr/g++ and */g++/* packages is incompatibility
between Studio C++ an GNU C++ ABI. Eariler we had to support /usr/g++,
because part of our packages depended on Studio-compiled C++
libraries, part - on GCC-compiled. Now it's not longer a case and we
deliver GNU C++-compiled libraries under /usr. SFE should work on
Solaris, so it still adhere to this practice (and it's the only good
way for Studio and GNU-compiled C++ code to coexist).
Thanks alp, just to check if I understood it right:
SFE under http://sfe.opencsw.org/localhostoih/ is made for OI hipster,
not Solaris, but SFE keeps same path and layouts to reuse packages for
all platfroms,SFE is made for.
OI hipster now removed g++ from oi-userland consolidation so that SFE
g++ and SFE packages will be working without collisions and g++ is now
installed from SFE with it's packages.
Instalaltions of SFE g++ happens in place of previously OI
hipster-compiled g++ and that is not the issue for OI hipster itself
because it does not depend on them?
Question is what happens with current installations and are OI
hipster-installed g++ packages replaced by adding SFE repository or some
of them get replaced and some don't.
Are g++ packages from OI hipster removed from oi-userland of they are
still there, but not installed by default, so one installing them can
still see collisions if SFE is added to instal external packages?
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
