The disks are in a Fractal XL case which have little rubber pad to
contain vibrations.
As long as it works I will leave it. When I will have some money I will
build a proper server
Once the resilvering is done, should I do a scrub job ?
Le 23/10/2013 10:16, Sebastian Gabler a écrit :
From 'zpool status' this looks very much like an issue I had myself
2.5 years ago with a pool containing WD20EARS and some other 2 TB
disks. It started exactly when I moved them from the Intel ICH to an
LSI SAS 1068 controller, and added more disks to the enclosure. I
decided then to destroy the whole pool and restore the data from a
backup (well, actually the original source because the broken pool was
the backup), without the WD20EARS involved.
I wonder if there is any rescue for the pool moving them to an adapter
they are compatible. I think that in any case the WD20EARS should be
fine, given you can make them work.
However, there is another issue to keep in mind: Vibration. WD20EARS
are not specified to run in multi-disk enclosures. They are quite
susceptible to vibration issues. It could be that you simple hit your
head to the wall at that point. Better use disks with better vibration
management.
BR
Sebastian
------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013
20:21:39 +1300 From: Mark <mark0...@gmail.com> To: Discussion list for
OpenIndiana <openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> Subject: Re:
[OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] problem on my zpool Message-ID:
<52677903.3030...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed One suggestion for the future for
better reliability. Avoid using WDC WD20EARS, they aren't great, and
hopeless on SAS controllers. Avoid mixing disk brands or models in a
zpool. The different behaviour can trigger issues. On 23/10/2013 7:46
p.m., Clement BRIZARD wrote:
I cleared the "degraded" disk. we will see what happens in 131hours
pool: nas
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool
will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scan: resilver in progress since Wed Oct 23 08:25:56 2013
2.23G scanned out of 22.2T at 48.6M/s, 133h22m to go
6.10M resilvered, 0.01% done
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
CAP Product
nas ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t50024E9004993E6Ed0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
c8t50024E92062E7524d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
c8t50024E900495BE84d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
c8t50014EE25A5EEC23d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB WDC WD20EARS-00M
c8t50024E9003F03980d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
c8t50014EE2B0D3EFC8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB WDC WD20EARX-00P
c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB WDC WD20EARS-00M
c8t50024E9003F03A09d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c50t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
(resilvering) 2 TB ST2000DL004 HD20
c2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
(resilvering) 2 TB
c1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
(resilvering) 2 TB
c50t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
c50t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
(resilvering) 2 TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
