I'll pass that on to someone actually, thanks, although would we lose pings with that (had pings running to test for a network issue and never had packet loss)? It's a bit of a puzzler!
James. Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Aug 2013, at 10:43, "Jim Klimov" <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote: > >> On 2013-08-11 11:13, James Relph wrote: >> Hi Ed, Chip, >> >> Thanks for the responses, it was basically to see whether people had been >> having any compatibility issues with Oi as backend storage. We've seen >> datastore disconnects in the ESXi hosts over both iSCSI and NFS, and it >> seemed odd that there'd be the same problems across both protocols. Didn't >> really show up in testing and I've seen other people running this kind of >> setup without issue, so it was really a question to see if there were any >> other people seeing the same thing. At the same time as the hosts were >> seeing disconnects we had other machines using the same iSCSI targets >> without any errors at all, so it is all a bit odd. > > Maybe something with networking? Like trunked connections and some > links going down (temporarily) and hash-routed packets to them are > not delivered properly (until the failure is detected or clink comes > back up)? Possibly, if a master (first) interface on an aggregation > becomes lost, there may also be fun with MAC address changes... > > Wild shots in the dark, though not completely without practical basis ;) > > HTH, > //Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
