On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:

SATA and SAS are dedicated point-to-point interfaces so there is no
additive bottleneck with more drives as long as the devices are directly
connected.

Not true. Modern flash storage is quite capable of saturating a 6 Gbps
SATA link. SAS has an advantage here, being dual-port natively with
active-active load balancing deployed as standard practice. Also please
note that SATA is half-duplex, whereas SAS is full-duplex.

You did not describe how my statement about not being "additive" is wrong. This is different than per-drive bandwidth being insufficient for latest SSDs. Please expound on "Not true".

SAS/SATA are not like old parallel SCSI.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Reply via email to