PS - Do you have any plans to package Dovecot's Pigeionhole Sieve? http://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/index.html
On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Milan Jurik wrote: > Hi, > > SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side, > at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them > to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no > time to look at it yet. > > Best regards, > > Milan > > On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: >> Who maintains the SFE package? If somebody is already maintaining it, I >> don't think I should butt in. (?) >> >> I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device >> drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly >> from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance >> process. If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be >> more inclined to do some package work for OI. I can't really take that on >> right now, though. At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, >> though! >> >> I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated? >> >> I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that >> hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that >> route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly. >> >> >> >> On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: >> >>> I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, >>> too. >>> >>> Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your >>> own installation updated from sources. >>> >>> Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not >>> terribly difficult even that. >>> >>> If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable >>> from somewhere, >>> and those are possibly a little easier to produce. >>> >>> Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call >>> on me, and I could try to help out. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote: >>>> How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated? >>>> >>>> service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z >>>> >>>> It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly >>>> enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on >>>> the sfe repository. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> v2.1.15 2013-02-08 Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> >>>> >>>> - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O >>>> and memory than necessary. >>>> --- >>>> >>>> I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in >>>> the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation. If I >>>> end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly >>>> up to date. I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe >>>> repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the >>>> sources. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >>>> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org >>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >>> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org >>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list >> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
