On 6 September 2012 02:51, Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote: <snip> >> If the answer is that I should be able to replace it, the next question is >> if anyone has done this before and how difficult this would be to do. > > > I assume you are talking about the client and not the server? If you are > talking about the client, then it seems possible to do this via an upgrade. > > If you are talking about the server, unless the ISC version is truely a > drop-in replacement, it would be best to make it an add-on package using > different directories so that it is possible to migrate from one to the > other and not crater users networks due to an update. As Gordon Ross > mentions, the Sun dhcp server has nice integration with a dhcpmgr GUI (which > I use under Solaris 10).
(All following comments are about the DHCP server) I happened to hate the GUI that came with the DHCP server, and always relied on the dhtadm and pntadm commands ... I assume that the ISC version will not use these commands, and will probably not be able to talk to the same datastores as the Sun version ... if the commands are different, or the datastores are not accessible/convertible then I would advise against replacing the Sun server with the ISC server, but look instead to changing the svc:/network/dhcp-server:default to svc:/network/dhcp-server:oracle and creating a new ISC svc:/network/dhcp-server:isc or something similar. If the ISC is not a drop in replacement and someone upgrades they will find that their server no longer works, and being a DHCP server will find that their network also no longer works. Jon _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss