Frank Lahm <franklahm <at> gmail.com> writes: > > 2012/8/10 Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross <at> gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Frank Lahm <franklahm <at> gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> 2012/8/10 Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross <at> gmail.com>: > > [...] > >>> If you setup idmap to use IDMU, then you'll get the UID/GID values > >>> provided by AD, which are presumably the same values your other LDAP > >>> clients will get from AD. :) > >> > >> <http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Active+Directory+Integration> > >> -f > >> > > > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=solaris+idmap+idmu > > *sigh* > I was just giving a pointer to some doc I have spent considerable time > and effort to provide a consolidated ressource for anybody facing this > problem. > You may notice that using idmu is one the things explained in great length. > Feel free to add links and add enhancements. > -f >
IDMU seems not really helpful. If one wants to provide a transparent multiprotokoll server (CIFS + AFP + AD + ACL support) on OpenIndiana, it must be fully integrated into the builtin CIFS mechanism without the need to add anything to AD - with CIFS you need no IDMU due to ephemeral mappings. Netatalk needs to use the (by the CIFS service) already created idmappings or it must create a similar ephemeral mapping for new users (transparent for the next CIFS user). How can that be done? _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
