yes, no_root_squash is a linux setting, it is what you achieve with root= in solaris. As far as i know id mapping (uid to uid) was not really necessary in nfs4 because nfs4 uses usernames instead of uids so it's just a matter of having the same users created everywhere no matter the uid.
nacho On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> wrote: > Thanx for your suggestion, but I think the no_root_squashing is achieved > through the "root=" > option on zfs. > Infact, my zfs share output is like this: > -@data/sonicle /data/sonicle/webtop > sec=sys,rw=@192.168.222.198/32,root=@192.168.222.198/32 "" > -@data/sonicle /data/sonicle/www > sec=sys,rw=@192.168.222.200/32,root=@192.168.222.200/32 "" > found no other way to disable root_squashing but this. > and actually, it's not squashing root, it's squashing any non existant uid on > the server. > any way to disable this? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Da: Alex Smith (K4RNT) > A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana > Data: 26 luglio 2011 16.40.40 CEST > Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] NFS4 users > If you don't use a unifying authentication system such as LDAP or > NIS+, look up the root_squash and no_root_squash NFS share options. > I'm not sure if this will fix your problems, I've used pure NFSv4 most > of the time. > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:29, Gabriele Bulfon > wrote: > Hi, is there any way to let NFS4 server not require the same users of the > client to exist on the server?? > I noticed that the root access on an NFS4 server, let me chmod on any user > who's id exists on the server, > wether it is same name or not. Any chmod to a uid not existent on the server, > is changed to nobody... > For example, I shared a filesystem, and filled it with an original > filesystem, through NFS3. > If I mount it with vers=3, I get all the correct permissions from the client > view, wether they exist or not > on the server. > If I mount the same share with vers=4, I get correct permissions only for > files with uid existent on the > server (even if different names), all the others files get the user > nobody............ > I want to use NFS4, because I noticed that locking management is much better, > and cyrus does not > complain. But this permission limitation is annoying. > Any idea? > Gabriele. > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- > " ' With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech > censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, > chains us all irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron > Satie as wisdom and warning... The first time any man's freedom is > trodden on we?re all damaged." - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron > Satie, Star Trek: TNG episode "The Drumhead" > - Alex Smith (K4RNT) > - Sterling, Virginia USA > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
