Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
Still, this is an (at least for me) important drawback, because that means that there is
no possibility to "upgrade" from solaris 11 express.
I thought that the goal was to be compatible with solaris 11 express, and
assumed that zfs/zpool versions would also be.
Of course I understand the difficulties, but isn't the numbering (151) slightly
misleading ?
AFAIK the base is still snv_148+patches for core elements, even if JDS, etc...
is in line with solaris 11 express.
How is this misleading? I don't see how '151' implies 'zfs/zpool
versions at least as new as SE11'?
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
