On Sunday, November 21, 2010 10:09 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 05:40 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 07:56 AM, Gary wrote:
In what way did I flame Gary? If expressing my opinion equates flaming
then I feel very sorry for you. In fact, if you want an example of a
flame, maybe what seems to be a sarcastic reply higher up seems to
smack of a flame more than my reply since I did not imply anything
about Gary.
Errr... You didn't flame him. "I" was flamed as I posted a message at
oi-dev list, which was considered out of topic.
Oh, that was what you were referring to. Well, I better wave my hands as
on of those fools who use Openindiana in production.
Read the thread started by Garrett d'Amore in oi-dev archives. It's
interesting. I agree with Garrett.
I am subscribed. Subscribed after Garrett let off some steam on IRC and
was told to post to oi-dev.
Being supported by some commercial companies is surely better than
having to work in a team with very constrained resources. And, IMHO, one
surely shall agree that people working on openindiana/illumos shall get
some benefit from their work. Ther's no free lunch... ;-)
Oh of course.
We can't have that. If everybody stays mum then how can we get a list
of ideas for vetting? For now I think we should stop worrying about
where innovation will come from and concentrate on keeping Openindiana
relevant.
Yesss... People should try to find the better roadmap to ensure illumos
and openindiana will survive. But I arrived to an age (> 50) when I
haven't any more time to discuss with kids wanting to flame me for
netiquette issues.
LOL. I'll get off your lawn now.
_______________________________________________
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
