> On Jul 21, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Hideyuki, > > This patch looks good to me, but looks like CSIT test is failing on this > patch. Did you run the CSIT-only-boron /CSIT-only-Beryllium test on these > patches ? > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-beryllium/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-beryllium/> > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron/> > > Shiguru/Hideyuki, I looked at the first test CSIT job > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-boron/12/ > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-patch-test-boron/12/> > : UNSTABLE (skipped) > > And it shows 4 failure for the *-only-boron job > (openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron/>#518 > > <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron/518/>) > and these flows are related to flow/group operational flow. Can you please > have a look at it and see if these are anyway related to your patch.
This test above is for patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/40429/ <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/40429/> (not 42213) These errors [1] are normal and are due to CPqD not being stable since we changes openflowjava to accommodate project requirements last release. [1] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/openflowplugin-csit-1node-flow-services-only-boron/518/archives/log.html.gz > > Luis, i think none of us have access to trigger these CSIT job against the > patch. I think shiguru and others tried to run test-openflowplugin, but looks > like all the attempt failed (Except the first one) for some reason. So if we > can get result of above two tests, we can merge the patch. The CI should be better now that we have migrated all csit jobs to public cloud, please retry test-openflowplugin and let me know if you have questions interpreting any of the results. > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tai, Hideyuki <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi committers of the OpenFlow Plugin project, > > Could you review and merge the following patch for the bug 6073? > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42213/ > <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42213/> > > We would like to get this change in the Beryllium SR3 which is cut off on > July 24. > > Best Regards, > Hideyuki Tai > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev> > > > > -- > Thanks > Anil
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
