Hello all. @Ana.
The Foundraising point is a different approach complementary to the approach proposed by Eric, let me show my point. Eric (and i think it is a good point) want to be sure that the modules included in the OCA projects are maintained by serious people that give the quality because they dedicate the time to test, verify, improve quality, It ensures less leak in terms of migration capability, future support, documentation and maintenance, helping to community to choose (from apps maybe) the modules certified by community because they have an strong team working on that. *End*. It is an approach. You (and i thin is a good "complementary" approach) are asking for new features that are so expensive to cover by one team-company even by OpenERP SA and need deep development, functional consultants, user cases and tests and will be so used, for this reason "maybe" we need a foundraising. *End*. It is "Other Approach" In line more comments. 2013/9/7 Ana Juaristi <ajuaris...@gmail.com> > HI everybody: > > My opinion is that fundraising should be made for each community project. > It can be very complicated founding something that people is contributing. > Maybe a little contribution could be needed to mantain the website or any > administrative tasks but it would be like paying a marketing site more than > contributing on modules. > I think that community should be totally open and noone can fix if > something have got enough quality to be included or not. For any > administrative validation task you include on ecosystem more difficult will > be mantaining it, more complex would be people to contribute and that's not > the objetive of community modules. > I would prefere having a totally open site where people can download any > module, even if it's not documented, even if it's not certified, even if it > has not quality and... let people using it including it's value with their > comments, votes and so on like hotel reserving websites or any other people > mantained site. > As much valued is a module more people will use it, so more services will > sell the contributor so more visibility will obtain with modules. > For this: (Putting in my words just trying to be empathic and understand the point). You are asking for an open place where only with declare the module people can vote, and download and see the code and use it and complain, and put bugs, and simply take the risk. IMHO it is Launchpad + Apps.openerp.com today. *End* of point. > On technical side, as much documented, much clear code, much used module > more visibility will obtain, so more people will use it, so it will be more > tested, so more valuation will obtain. > On the other side, if someone has got a very good idea about a new > blueprint / functionality a new foundrising project could be created to > obtain founds to realize that project. > > I don't think so community modules should be fiscalized very much. > About this. IMHO i don't use modules without fiscalice internally by myself, because i don't know what I will find, i think everybody do this, you don't simply put a module in production and run, right?. IMHO the "Fiscal part" must be done as Eric is asking for and it is expensive and time consuming, maybe has a team that is in charge of this task is a good idea and between all can pay this dedicated team, why not? even if some others help by free both model do not exclude themselves. * * *End of point* > We need focusing about a place where community can download, comment, > report bugs, contribute and value other people contributions. > It is apps, and it is mantained by openERP SA, my be the hidden crowdfounding there is be partner or by services to them. > I will agree on contributing in a crowdfunding project to realize this but > I don't see very clear contributing to something to cover costs that are > not clear yet. > Ana, i am afraid on this doubt, let me give you "sorry for be so explicit here" some examples where is the work Eric is asking for (because it is almost all done by the same people today for free and we need more help ASAP) Look in: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~server-env-tools-core-editors/server-env-tools/7.0/changes/47 47 commits, "Somebody took time to do this job.", right? who pay for it? our customers and some of them for free! Look in: https://code.launchpad.net/~server-env-tools-core-editors/server-env-tools/7.0/+activereviews We have 5 MP waiting for approval and test *End of Job, it is Quality ensurance and ...... frequently it is the dirty job that nobody wants to pay for * * * *but.... Everybody criticizes .... a good example is the sorryo.... campain. * Next: Download this branch, bzr branch lp:server-env-tools sudo apt-get install cloc cd server-env-tools cloc . Result:: 77 text files. 74 unique files. 45 files ignored. http://cloc.sourceforge.net v 1.58 T=0.5 s (120.0 files/s, 5788.0 lines/s) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Language files blank comment code ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Python 44 233 1010 1146 XML 16 26 8 471 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUM: 60 259 1018 1617 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have 1146 lines of code and 1010 lines of comments and total of 1617 LoC. This is the job we can do with crowdfounding (and was crowdfounded already by our customers), but it does not ensure the quality it ensure *"The Feature"*. Kindly, I hope I clarified the difference from My point of view and help Ana to see where the founding and contribution can go and I maintain my initial point of view, it is good time to discuss, but to early to take some decision or even make some action because we have a long way in front of us yet. Regards. > > Thank you very much: > Ana > > > 2013/9/7 Stefan <ste...@therp.nl> > >> On 09/07/2013 12:23 PM, Eric Caudal wrote: >> >> >> I would see the certification less as a technical quality control and >> more as an operation of marketing and visibility of the current community >> work. >> >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> It seems to me that the criteria mainly have technical implications. Of >> course, the concerns you mention are all valid. So what do you think of >> assigning this seal of approval simply based on whether a module comes from >> a project which falls under the community review, while making the >> requirements that you expressed explicit in the reviewing guidelines (maybe >> after reviewing some existing code for older modules)? >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan. >> >> >> -- >> Therp - Maatwerk in open ontwikkeling >> >> Stefan Rijnhart - Ontwerp en implementatie >> >> mail: ste...@therp.nl >> tel: +31 (0) 614478606 >> web: http://therp.nl >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > > -- > CEO Avanzosc, S.L <http://www.avanzosc.es> : Office phone / Tfono > oficina: (+34) 943 02 69 02 > Ana Juaristi Olalde <http://www.anajuaristi.com/>: Personal phone: 677 93 > 42 59. User/usuario skype: Avanzosc > www.openerpsite.com > > > *El contenido de esta comunicación y de toda su documentación anexa es > confidencial y se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. El uso no > autorizado de esta información está prohibido por la legislación vigente. > Si usted no es el destinatario le rogamos nos lo indique, no comunique su > contenido a terceros y proceda a su destrucción. Disculpe las molestias que > le haya ocasionado la recepción indebida de este e-mail. Sus datos figuran > en un fichero cuyo titular es Avanzosc, S.L., a quien usted puede dirigirse > para ejercer sus derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición > en Julio Urkijo, 32, 20720, Azkoitia (Gipuzkoa), Tef. 943 02 69 02 - > administrac...@avanzosc.com <sopo...@avanzosc.com> * > * * > > *Komunikazio honen edukia eta dokumentazio erantsia konfidentziala da eta > hartzaileak bakarrik jaso beharko luke. Indarrean dagoen legeriak debekatu > egiten du bertan eskainitako informazioa baimenik gabe erabiltzea. > Komunikazioa zuri iritsi bazaizu, baina zu ez bazara hartzailea, mesedez, > guri jakinarazi, eta jasotako informazioa ez inori jakinarazi eta suntsitu. > Barkatu okerreko email hau jasotzeak eragindako eragozpenak. Zure datuak > Avanzosc, S.L. enpresaren fitxategietan sartuta daude. Zure datuak atzitzea > eska dezakezu, bai eta, datuak zuzentzea, ezereztea eta tratamenduari > aurka egitea ere. Horretarako, enpresara jo dezakezu, helbide honetan: Julio > Urkijo, 32, 20720, Azkoitia (Gipuzkoa), telefonoa: 943 02 69 02 - ** > administrac...@avanzosc.com <sopo...@avanzosc.com> * > *This message and all documents attached to it are confidential and > intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any use of > this information by unauthorised persons is prohibited under current > legislation. If you received this message by error, please advise us, > destroy it and refrain from communicating its contents to third parties. We > apologise for any inconvenience receiving this email improperly may cause > to you. Your personal data are included in a file owned by Avanzosc, S.L. > If you want to exercise your rights of access, correction, erasure and > objection you can contact the Controller at Julio Urkijo, 32, 20720, > Azkoitia (Gipuzkoa), T: 943 02 69 02 – > administrac...@avanzosc.com<sopo...@avanzosc.com> > * > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- -------------------- Saludos Cordiales Nhomar G. Hernandez M. +58-414-4110269 Skype: nhomar00 Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com Linux-Counter: 467724 Correos: nho...@openerp.com.ve nho...@vauxoo.com twitter @nhomar
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
