This is not strictly a nativesdk issue. If you enable PACKAGECONFIG = "compiler" for protobuf, it will then build protoc for the target. This will then cause grpc target build to fail in the same way as nativesdk build.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 08:40, Vyacheslav Yurkov <[email protected]> wrote: > FTR, I suggested oe-core solution in the corresponding mailing list. > > Slava > > On 10.11.2023 07:19, Vyacheslav Yurkov via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > On 10.11.2023 02:23, Clément Péron wrote: > > Hi Samuli, > > Le ven. 10 nov. 2023, 00:05, Vyacheslav Yurkov <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Thanks for the explanation, that was the missing piece for me to get an >> understanding of the problem :) >> >> I think it's not only me, but also others, were confused by the fact that >> we are talking about native(sdk), but try to fix something with a >> non-native variable. >> >> I've just gave it a try and have two suggestions how this can be >> addressed. >> >> 1. Recipe based solution: >> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-nativesdk = " $bindir}" >> > > Is it not just missing something like > > DEPENDS:append:class-nativesdk = " protobuf-native " > > Regards > > Clement > > > This is already implicit by DEPENDS += "protobuf". Take a look at my > second suggestion. You can see that ${bindir} is staged for native recipes, > but not for nativesdk. > > >> 2. oe-core based solution: >> --- a/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE = " \ >> ${localstatedir} \ >> " >> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-native = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}" >> +SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-nativesdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}" >> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-cross = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}" >> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-crosssdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}" >> >> The second one will invalidate nativesdk sstate, but might cover not only >> grpc issue (I would assume gdbus-codegen or any other generator has the >> same issue when used for SDK build). >> >> What are your thoughs? >> >> Thanks, >> Slava >> >> On 09.11.2023 14:35, Samuli Piippo wrote: >> >> DEPENDS += "protobuf" is enough to have dependencies resolved. >> >> Problem is that bitbake's do_populate_sysroot does not take anything from >> bindir. >> This leads to nativesdk-(qt)grpc's do_prepare_recipe_sysroot to not get >> the protoc binary into the recipe_sysroot as expected by CMake. >> >> This can be fixed with SYSROOT_DIRS. >> >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vyacheslav Yurkov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Clément, >>> No, the issue is when you just build nativesdk recipe (we are not at the >>> stage to use the SDK yet). >>> >>> And that was exactly my question how to propagate the dependency >>> correctly for nativesdk build. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Slava >>> >> >> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#106527): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/106527 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101679410/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
