On 10 July 2017 at 21:22, <libertad.c...@intel.com> wrote:
> +class opkgBasicTest(opkgTest):
> + @skipIfNotFeature('package-management', 'Test requires
> package-management to be in IMAGE_FEATURES')
> + @skipIfNotDataVar('IMAGE_PKGTYPE','ipk', 'IPK is not the primary
> package manager')
> + @OEHasPackage(['opkg'])
> +
> + @OETestDepends(['ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh'])
> + @OETestID(1841)
> + def test_opkg_list(self):
> + self.opkg('list')
> +
> + @OETestID(1842)
> + def test_opkg_list_installed(self):
> + self.opkg('list-installed')
> +
> + @OETestID(1843)
> + def test_opkg_depends(self):
> + self.opkg('depends opkg')
> +
> + @OETestID(1837)
> + def test_opkg_whatdepends(self):
> + self.opkg('whatdepends opkg')
> +
> + @OETestID(1838)
> + def test_opkg_status(self):
> + self.opkg('status')
> +
> + @OETestID(1839)
> + def test_opkg_info(self):
> + self.opkg('info opkg')
> +
> + @OETestID(1840)
> + def test_opkg_print_architecture(self):
> + self.opkg('print-architecture')
>
I'd feel a lot happier that this was a selftest if it was exercising more
than "opkg doesn't crash". If opkg is replaced by a script that does "echo
haha; exit 0" this test case would pass, so can it verify the output too.
Ross
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
