On 07/13/2017 10:20 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Aníbal Limón <anibal.li...@linux.intel.com >> wrote: > >> When tinfoil request a command to bitbake is handled in async >> manner [1], sometimes is this ends on return a Busy status. >> >> This is a workaround a needs to be fixed in proper manner >> inside bitbake code. >> > > I’m assuming you verified this doesn’t cause issues with synchronous > commands? Not all commands are async, after all, but the comment in your > retry logic acts like they are.
Yes, this a workaround, and now only is applied to clientComplete command that is async, we need to review the bitbake code and make the proper fix. This patch could be removed for the integration. Cheers, Anibal > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
