On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 15:23 -0500, Aníbal Limón wrote: > The tinfoil tests needs to initialize bitbake internals and wasn't > designed to be in a thread environment causing problems when try > for example set signal handlers in a thread different than the > main one. > > To workaround this execute tinfoil tests in the main thread and > don't use custom builddir because isn't make sense too. > > Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.li...@linux.intel.com> > --- > meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > index aa1af7e0423..7248b755812 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py > @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ from oeqa.core.decorator.oeid import OETestID > > class TinfoilTests(OESelftestTestCase): > """ Basic tests for the tinfoil API """ > - > @OETestID(1568) > def test_getvar(self): > with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
There's just a line removal in this patch. That's probably not what was intended? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
