On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:09:47PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:12:19PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:08:41PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On 7/10/17 12:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:02:39PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > >> On 07/10/2017 09:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 08:57:19PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > >>>> On 07/10/2017 08:51 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On 07/10/2017 08:36 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> This patch upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.07 release.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>
> > > >>>>>>> ---
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.05.inc =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-common_2017.07.inc} | 2 +-
> > > >>>>>>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.05.bb =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb} | 0
> > > >>>>>>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.05.bb =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb} | 0
> > > >>>>>>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.05.bb => u-boot_2017.07.bb}
> > > >>>>>>> | 0
> > > >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >>>>>>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.05.inc =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-common_2017.07.inc} (88%)
> > > >>>>>>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.05.bb =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb} (100%)
> > > >>>>>>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.05.bb =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb} (100%)
> > > >>>>>>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.05.bb =>
> > > >>>>>>> u-boot_2017.07.bb} (100%)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.05.inc
> > > >>>>>>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc
> > > >>>>>>> similarity index 88%
> > > >>>>>>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.05.inc
> > > >>>>>>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc
> > > >>>>>>> index 0e52f27df8..f27989daa1 100644
> > > >>>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.05.inc
> > > >>>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc
> > > >>>>>>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1"
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from
> > > >>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>> # repo during parse
> > > >>>>>>> -SRCREV = "64c4ffa9fa223f7ae8640f9c8f3044bfa0e3bfda"
> > > >>>>>>> +SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943"
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Where did you get this hash from, it's not in the U-Boot repo ...
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> From the tag used by Tom. You can check it on his github repository.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I cannot, that is NOT where the U-Boot recipe points to nor is it in
> > > >>>> any
> > > >>>> way an official U-Boot source git tree .
> > > >>>
> > > >>> It's also on the official github mirror. I'll go see why the DENX git
> > > >>> is lagging behind.
> > > >>
> > > >> Hm that's weird. How can it be a mirror if it contains objects not in
> > > >> the mirrored repo ? ;-)
> > > >
> > > > git supports multiple push URIs. So I update all 3 locations with a
> > > > single push. However, git.denx.de works differently than github.com
> > > > does.
> > >
> > > may be pushing to upstream and then pulling before populating the
> > > mirrors could solve such issues. but I think we should use github.com
> > > in OE src_uri's for speed reasons.
> >
> > On the back end, things are a bit more complex than that, but I'm
> > working to resolve the current error now. FWIW, changing the OE recipe
> > to fetch from https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git would be fine with
> > me, it's owned by myself, Wolfgang and the person that helped us out and
> > got that project created to start with, so it will only have official
> > changes in it.
>
> FWIW, I'd be against such change, as long as denx.de remains the official
> home of U-boot. We don't pull kernel from https://github.com/torvalds/linux
No, but you do pull it from ${KERNELORG_MIRROR}. At the end of the day,
I don't have a preference either way. git.denx.de is the official home,
github has an official mirror. We've actually put in some time making
sure that git.denx.de is in-sync and up to date (this recent issue was
that incrond has an inode leak). It should be considered a reliable
source.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
