On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 11:59 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl> > wrote: > > On 22-03-17 23:47, Andre McCurdy wrote: > >> > >> Try to avoid native recipes accidentally being dependent on > >> MACHINE_FEATURES. This simple change doesn't prevent MACHINE_FEATURES > >> set via MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL sneaking through, but it's better > >> than nothing. > > > > Maybe this would work: > > > > MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED = "${MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL}" > > I guess it doesn't work if MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED is set > elsewhere using _append. > > The real solution would probably be to skip backfilling > MACHINE_FEATURES entirely for class-native?
Perhaps set MACHINE_FEATURES_forcevariable = "" in native.bbclass? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core