Hi Leo, On Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:53:31 AM NZDT Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) > Revision: 1 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/5923/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following results: > > > > * Issue [pretest_src_uri_checksums_not_changed] > > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest > [pretest_src_uri_left_files] > > * Issue No added or modified recipes, skipping pretest > [pretest_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned] > > * Issue [pretest_pylint] > > * Issue [test_max_line_length] > > * Issue [test_cve_presence_in_commit_message] > > * Issue [test_cve_tag_format] > > * Issue [test_shortlog_format] > > * Issue [test_shortlog_length] > > * Issue [test_summary_presence] > > * Issue [test_upstream_status_format] > > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test > Upstream-Status presence [test_upstream_status_presence] > > * Issue Until general agreement with the community, disabling it > [test_commit_message_presence] > > * Issue [test_mbox_format] > > * Issue [test_series_merge_on_head] > > * Issue [test_src_uri_checksums_not_changed] > > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest > [test_src_uri_left_files] > > * Issue [test_bugzilla_entry_format] > > * Issue [test_signed_off_by_presence] > > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test > Signed-off-by presence [test_signed_off_by_presence] > > * Issue Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists > [test_target_mailing_list] > > * Issue No modified or added recipes, skipping test > [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned] > > * Issue No added recipes, skipping test > [test_lic_files_chksum_presence] > > * Issue [test_pylint] > > * Issue [test_author_valid]
These results look a bit broken - some are skipped and really shouldn't be showing at all. Was the script invoked in a different way to normal? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
