On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves >>> MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a >>> legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on >>> MACHINE_FEATURES? >> >> MACHINE_FEATURES is specific to target only. > > Right, the question is really whether we should try to enforce that or not. >
we are better off to nullify it for native case. Worth a pull request :) -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
