On 3/11/17 12:30 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > potentially a dumb question, but do the settings in > files/fs-perms.txt affect the building of the base-files rpm just as > they would affect the building of any other rpm?
it should be executing fixup_perms() in PKGD before splitting the package, so yes it should run for all recipes. > > i can see the structure of the base-files recipe, whose do_install() > routine manually installs a ton of stuff, with very specific file and > directory modes, which is fine. and assuming fs-perms.txt is applied > after that, does that mean that whatever is in that fs-perms.txt file > will override any settings already in place as built by the base-files > recipe? > > also, as i understand it, given that fs-perms.txt is used to set > file and directory modes for all created packages, does that mean that > any discrepancy between a package and what is already in the root > filesystem will cause a package installation error? > > i already ran across the situation where a package was built > assuming a volatile log directory, but the running image it was being > installed into had a regular /var/log directory, and that caused the > package installation to fail. am i correct in assuming that is normal > behaviour? > > thank you kindly. > > rday > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
