On 17-02-17 13:10:56, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 16:30 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > From: meta-luv <l...@lists.01.org> > > > > This is an unmodified copy of > > github.com/01org/luv-yocto/meta-luv/recipes-core/ovmf revision > > 4be4329. > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-world/builds/156 > > which boils down to: > > | "gcc-ar" cr > /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/MdeModulePkg/Library/BootLogoLib/BootLogoLib/OUTPUT/BootLogoLib.lib > > @/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/MdeModulePkg/Library/BootLogoLib/BootLogoLib/OUTPUT/object_files.lst > | make: *** > [/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/MdeModulePkg/Library/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib/DEBUG/BootMaintenanceManager.c] > Error 2 > | VfrCompile: ERROR 1003: Invalid option value > | VFR file name > /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/MdeModulePkg/Library/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib/OUTPUT/BootMaintenanceManager.i > is too long. > | "gcc-ar" cr > /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/OvmfPkg/Library/NvVarsFileLib/NvVarsFileLib/OUTPUT/NvVarsFileLib.lib > > @/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-world/build/build/tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-ovmf/git-r0/git/Build/OvmfIa32/RELEASE_GCC5/IA32/OvmfPkg/Library/NvVarsFileLib/NvVarsFileLib/OUTPUT/object_files.lst > > i.e. path length issues. > > We saw this on multiple builds :(.
I wonder why its using gcc-ar that should actually be <cross>-gcc-ar so probably we need to set AR to point to <cross>-gcc-ar, but I would like to see if we can use normal ar since gcc-ar would fail with clang -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
