Too many places in dnf/rpm4 stack make that assumption; let's not fight against it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> --- meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass index bde04532875..36625fe02cc 100644 --- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass @@ -686,7 +686,9 @@ python do_package_rpm () { rpmbuild = d.getVar('RPMBUILD') targetsys = d.getVar('TARGET_SYS') targetvendor = d.getVar('HOST_VENDOR') - package_arch = (d.getVar('PACKAGE_ARCH') or "").replace("-", "_") + # Too many places in dnf stack assume that arch-independent packages are "noarch". + # Let's not fight against this. + package_arch = (d.getVar('PACKAGE_ARCH') or "").replace("-", "_").replace("all", "noarch") sdkpkgsuffix = (d.getVar('SDKPKGSUFFIX') or "nativesdk").replace("-", "_") if package_arch not in "all any noarch".split() and not package_arch.endswith(sdkpkgsuffix): ml_prefix = (d.getVar('MLPREFIX') or "").replace("-", "_") -- 2.11.0 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core