On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 08:50 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 13:02 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Enable the linux-intel production kernel for meta-intel by > > > > default > > > > for 4.9, > > > > this will enable using the Intel production kernel. > > > > > > > > This is a well tested 4.9 tree that will start to include > > > > additional > > > > support for the Apollolake and Joule hardware. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc > > > > b/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc > > > > index 21587fb..eb759c4 100644 > > > > --- a/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc > > > > +++ b/conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc > > > > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ > > > > # > > > > > > > > # Soft set linux-yocto as preferred kernel like x86-base.inc > > > > -PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ??= "linux-yocto" > > > > -PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto ?= "4.8%" > > > > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ?= "linux-intel" > > > > > > whats the difference between linux-yocto and linux-intel ? > > > > > Sorry for sending this to the wrong list. > > > > This is a valid question, the difference will be faster integration > > and > > better testing /validation of upstream (or possibly pending > > upstream ) > > patches for Intel Hardware. > > > > Since the kernel will be coming from an Intel Source, it will be > > fully > > tested on more hardware that the current linux-yocto kernel gets > > tested > > against. > > > > The update rate maybe about the same, with security updates as > > needed > > for more severe issues > > > > As other vendors maintain kernels for their meta-vendor specific > > layer, > > Intel has chosen to maintain an Intel kernel based on the current > > LTS > > version (4.9) plus upstreamed patches. All content will be > > backports > > from internally maintained tracking trees being regularly updated. > > > > meta-intel will likely continue to contain the linux-yocto-<latest> > > for > > a non-LTS kernel. > > > > Hope that clarifies this. > > yes it does. So this is not a clone of linux-yocto but based directly > on linux-stable. > Correct, this is based directly on linux-stable and will have patches that are backports from maintained tracking trees. As the new LTS is defined each year, linux-intel and meta-intel will update to that newer version. The older version will continue to be available and be updated with stable updates as they are available.
Sau! > > > > > > Sau! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-intel ?= "4.9%" > > > > > > > > # for Xserver older than 1.13.0 > > > > OLD_XSERVER_X86_EXT = "xserver-xorg-extension-dri \ > > > > -- > > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-cor > > > > e -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core