On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Anders Darander <and...@chargestorm.se> wrote: > * Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> [170201 17:52]: > >> On 1/30/17 11:18 PM, Anders Darander wrote: >> > This allows us to use html.py without importing misc. > >> html.py is provided by many packages. Does is make more sense to package >> html.py on a package of its own ? > > Hm, I had another look at this. On my build: > > $ du -sh python3-html/ > 140K python3-html/ > > $ du -sh python3-html/usr/lib/python3.5/html/ > 108K python3-html/usr/lib/python3.5/html/ > > Thus, the major part, 77%, of python3-html is related to my change. > Thus, I'm not sure that it makes sense to put html in it's own > package... > > I'm not going to add a new package for html for the moment. >
OK, I guess we have to address is when we have more occurances of packages providing html.py show up -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
