On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 08:56 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On 1/31/17 1:05 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > This fixes a potential pollution by the build host and build error > > when yacc isn't installed on the build host: > > > > | ../../libtasn1-4.9/build-aux/ylwrap: line 175: yacc: command not found > > | Makefile:1116: recipe for target 'ASN1.c' failed > > | make[3]: *** [ASN1.c] Error 127 > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> > > --- > > meta/recipes-support/gnutls/libtasn1_4.9.bb | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/libtasn1_4.9.bb > > b/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/libtasn1_4.9.bb > > index b8ff9eaf7a9..3da5d4bcc56 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/libtasn1_4.9.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/gnutls/libtasn1_4.9.bb > > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/libtasn1/libtasn1-${PV}.tar.gz \ > > file://0004-tools-eliminated-compiler-warnings.patch \ > > " > > > > +DEPENDS = "bison-native" > > + > > nit on style, you generally put checksum assignments immediately after > SRC_URI containing the origninal src location. Secondly, if we use += > then we dont run the risk of it overwriting prior assignments if any
Makes sense, will change that as suggested. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core