On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 11 January 2017 at 16:42, Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> > wrote: >> >> I did pretty much the same "fix" inside connman (defined >> __UAPI_DEF_IF_NET_DEVICE_FLAGS_LOWER_UP_DORMANT_ECHO 0 everywhere the >> problem shows up) and it works... but should the hack be done somewhere in >> the toolchain instead? > > > I'm pretty convinced that musl's if.h should be defining it.
kernel does have a file to abstact the libc nuances uapi/linux/libc-compat.h sadly, it assumes that only libc linux kernel supports is glibc and that is what the problem is here. > > Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
