On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On 1 December 2016 at 03:42, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If libva goes in, can we get libva-intel-driver in as well? > > > > > Those go > > > > > hand-in-glove currently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Khem, does the AMD BSP use that? I'd have thought that bit was > > > > actually > > > > meta-intel specific. > > > > > > its intel BSPs specific > > > > > > So I'd endorse libva for oe-core, and the intel-driver remains in > > meta-intel. > > I am fine with proposal. This is time for someone to raise > objections. > As meta-intel maintainer I am OK with this, makes more sense than going into meta-oe. Please be sure to include meta-in...@yoctoproject.org for this.
I'm wondering if we should also move the gstreamer-vaapi-1.0 recipe to oe-core to be with it's brethren? Sau! > > > > > > Ross > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
