On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 14:28 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote: > Agree. Please provide feedback about below comments and I will submit a > v3 patch. > > On 11/28/2016 01:47 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 10:23 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote: > More than 1 "In-Reply-To" and "References" message headers are in > violation of rfc2822 [1] and may cause that some email-related > applications do not point to the appropriate root message in a > conversation/series.
Fixing that makes sense. Just add it as reason and the "why" part is covered. > > And I don't understand why this proposed change has the described > > effect. Does changing the threading parameters change the output of "git > > send-email" and thus indirectly the mail headers of the following > > patches? The "how" part still isn't clear to me. Perhaps I'm just dumb, but would you bear with me and explain a bit more how changing the sending of the cover letter affects sending of the patches? As it isn't obvious, perhaps even add a comment to the script explaining it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
