> On Oct 31, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Alexander Kanavin > <alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 10/31/2016 05:45 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> Alex, any idea what's happened here? Do you have the originals from when you >>> did the upgrade? >> >> Hmm, it seems we aren't the only ones to have hit this: >> >> http://osdir.com/ml/blfs-dev/2016-10/msg00013.html >> >> That said, I still don't think we should blindly trust the latest archives >> until we're sure of what the differences are. > > Sourceforge is doing too-clever redirecting that fails miserably here: > > Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently > Location: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/snapshots/master/boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2 > [following] > > So we've been fetching a moving master snapshot all along. Patch is coming > shortly.
we should specify boost/boost/1.62.0/boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2 instead of boost/boost/boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2 > > Alex >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
