On 2016-10-11 14:36, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 11 October 2016 at 13:26, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com <mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: Did you mean to swap the items? The old version used machine, elf.machine() and this version uses elf.machine(), machine Yes, because the string format changed to be clearer too: - package_qa_add_message(messages, "arch", "Architecture did not match (%d to %d) on %s" % \ - (machine, elf.machine(), package_qa_clean_path(path,d))) + package_qa_add_message(messages, "arch", "Architecture did not match (%s, expected %s) on %s" % \ + (oe.qa.elf_machine_to_string(elf.machine()), oe.qa.elf_machine_to_string(machine), The old message would say "20 to 62", the new message is "x86-64, expected PowerPC".
Much nicer indeed. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core