On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:30:15 Aníbal Limón wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 02:25 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:17:27 Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >> The PR is not need so remove it after upgrade to 6.0.35.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <anibal.li...@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.35.bb | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.35.bb
> >> b/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.35.bb index 32afbe8..ecb1bee 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.35.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.35.bb
> >> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ LICENSE = "AGPL-3.0"
> >>
> >> VIRTUAL_NAME ?= "virtual/db"
> >> RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "db3"
> >>
> >> -PR = "r1"
> >> -
> >>
> >> # Note, when upgraded to 6.1.x, a patch in RPM will need to be removed
> >> to
> >>
> >> activate db 6.1 support. SRC_URI =
> >> "http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/db-${PV}.tar.gz \
> >> file://arm-thumb-mutex_db5.patch \
> >
> > I think it's too late to do this unfortunately - it needs to be done at
> > the
> > same time as the upgrade.
>
> I sent a PATCHv3 [1] removing the PR but unfortunately was not integrated.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-September/127
> 027.html
Understood - for most other changes we'd want to have a follow-up patch to
apply what's missing, but for PR it's still too late - the r1 value is already
merged and packages could have been built from it. Decreasing PR now will make
the version number go backwards which we want to avoid.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
