On 9/28/16 10:44 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 09/28/2016 06:44 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 9/28/16 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> We need to understand that disclaimer may be its requiring every one who is >>> distributing it to accept it. >> >> It is purely Oracle wanting to stop people from automatically downloading >> from >> them, also so they can harvest sales contacts. (nothing wrong with that, >> but it >> means that we should likely pick a different 'upstream'...) >> >> As Anibal indicated, the license itself has not changed -- so that is not an >> issue. > > Mark, what is the current situation with 6.1/6.2 series of db? Are those > fit for updating to?
There are issues with the way BerkleyDB handles certain files. Once that we've not have any time or resources to investigate. So we're stuck w/ 6.0.35 right now. (The issues have to do with journal file generation in a cross environment with RPM 5. All I know is that it wasn't working before, most likely due to a configuration issue, but I've simply had no time to investigate.) Symptoms: Either during rootfs generation we get failures or code appears to work fine the first time through, but as soon as you run it on the target everything breaks. > Alex > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
