On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/05/2016 06:22 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 09/05/2016 03:51 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Wouldn't that break some BSPs ? I factored out code from the u-boot.inc >>>>> afterall. >>>> >>>> It will but I consider this fine for master as this clean up the >>>> recipes and ensures people goes on the review process while upgrading >>>> it. >>>> >>> The u-boot recipe mess would need _far_ more cleanup . If you don't mind >>> me breaking all sorts of BSPs , I would gladly do far more intrusive >>> changes. What do you say ? >> >> I would love to see the proposed patches. >> > That'd depend on whether they'd be NAK'd right away for breaking BSPs or > not.
It will depends on the type of breakage and the benefits it puts on the table. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
