Hi Randy & Ross

1. After my test, python2 & python3 works well.
2. I will follow-up the packages docs related to the asciidoc and work on the
    generation of docs, let it be optional.

//dengke

On 2016年08月03日 01:59, Randy MacLeod wrote:

As Ross asked in a separate reply, we should discuss
the pros and cons of making the host-based generation of docs
be optional. I think that's the way to go since, in the common case
of not enabling docs, the builds would be faster and the output smaller.

On 2016-07-31 09:33 PM, dengke...@windriver.com wrote:
Hi Randy

1.  I have checked the asciidoc-native: 3.1M

2.  real    4m41.858s
     user    27m3.280s
     sys    6m32.372s



Those numbers, on their own, are not useful.

How long does it take to build another native package on your system?
What's the overall time  and time difference to build an image without
and then with asciidoc and perf (and maybe ccache, git, trace-cmd)
docs being generated? Alternatively just make the generation of docs
be optional and then the time isn't a critical concern.

You should follow-up, ***later*** by enabling doc generation for:

commit 40627f5c334544178b056078da5e1d645ebd2a38
Author: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 25 01:16:31 2016 -0700

    ccache: 3.2.4 -> 3.2.5

    Add Revert-Create-man-page-in-the-make-install-from-git-.patch to
    disable asciidoc since we don't have it.


and perhaps:


commit 9aba4bf2143c228d58aac06764f87ace5dd21d02
Author: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 10 14:17:37 2015 -0500

    git: expand recipe to take advantage of pre-gen'd manpages

    These could be created from scratch from git itself, but it
    requires asciidoc, xsltproc, python bits and too much other
    baggage.  Since the git folks issue a tarball with the manpages
    for each release, it is simpler to just go get that.

and:

commit 73ac48377491561151658617d8cc45936242eb0c
Author: Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Nov 30 17:58:52 2011 -0800

    trace-cmd: Update to 1.2 (includes kernelshark)


3.  Yes, the build system using python3.

so what about python2? Does asciidoc require a specific major version
of python?

../Randy


//dengke

On 2016年07月28日 02:23, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 2016-07-27 01:02 AM, Dengke Du wrote:
The following changes since commit
36feb38045b7a2af86ece147fec54b0db3bf491f:

  linux-yocto: Update genericx86* SRCREVs for linux-yocto 4.4
(2016-07-21 07:48:53 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
dengke/enable-help-man-pages-for-perf
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=dengke/enable-help-man-pages-for-perf


Dengke Du (2):
  Asciidoc: add it
  perf: enable man pages for 'help' functionality

 meta/recipes-extended/asciidoc/asciidoc_8.6.9.bb | 20
++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb                 | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/asciidoc/asciidoc_8.6.9.bb


Looks good .

I was under the impression that asciidoc was larger but it's just
 ~ 900KB plus it's all python so it's not going to add to the system
build time directly.

How much longer does it take to build perf?

Did you test for python3 only?





--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to