> On Jul 20, 2016, at 8:19 PM, g...@andred.net wrote:
>
> From: André Draszik <adras...@tycoint.com>
>
> musl contains hand-written assembly which is not compatible with
> the MIPS16e mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <adras...@tycoint.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> index 5e6cd01..276b00f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> @@ -24,3 +24,6 @@ FILES_SOLIBSDEV = ""
> FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/lib*${SOLIBSDEV}"
> INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "dev-so"
>
> +# Doesn't compile in MIPS16e mode due to use of hand-written
> +# assembly
> +MIPS_INSTRUCTION_SET = “mips"Looks ok. However, does it make sense to have it compiled with mips ISA for a mips16e part ? will it work in all cases or only certain SOCs > -- > 2.8.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
