Hi Dmitry, Can you re-send this as a patch against oe-core itself instead of (presumably) binutils, explaining why it breaks for you and why this is the correct fix?
Thanks, Ross On 17 June 2016 at 10:33, Dmitriy Falko <d.fa...@partner.samsung.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Falko <d.fa...@partner.samsung.com> > --- > libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c b/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c > index 38cfd83..2689263 100644 > --- a/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c > +++ b/libc/misc/gnu/obstack.c > @@ -385,11 +385,11 @@ obstack_free (struct obstack *h, void *obj) > abort (); > } > > -# if 0 > + > /* Older versions of libc used a function _obstack_free intended to be > called by non-GCC compilers. */ > strong_alias (obstack_free, _obstack_free) > -# endif > + > > int > _obstack_memory_used (struct obstack *h) > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
