> On Apr 28, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: > > On 4/28/16 2:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 4/27/16 12:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in >>>> fixing them is welcome. >>>> >>>> 1. kernel older than 4.4, backport needed fixed into these branches or >>>> move to newer kernels. >>>> 2. uboot dont have gcc6 compiler header files, backport the needed fixes >>>> 2. meta-qt4 needs to use gnu++98 >>>> 3. gcc6 providing its own stdlib.h in libstdc++ >>>> 4. gcc6 swtiching to gnu++14 for C++ as default. >>>> 5. GPLv2-only versions of recipes are simply old will need fixing >>> >>> From a -very- brief look, I suspect each of these fixes will be fairly >>> simple. >>> So as we move into the next oe-core phase, we should be able get through >>> this >>> pretty quickly. >> >> I think yes, they are trivial, except the GPL-2.0 packages which might need >> patching >> > > Ha, actually that was what I was referring to. The couple I looked at seemed > to > be trivial.. :)
yes they are just the fact that compiler has gone stricter compliance with standards compared to when code was written. In worst case we might downgrade -std for these recipe but that may not be enough in some cases > > If someone doesn't get to it first, I expect some of my guys will in about a > month. > OK cool. I think we should make it merge worthy and get it early into master and fix the fallouts > --Mark
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
