The variable in question should have been called ecc->p. The patch has been 
updated
so that the compilation of the nettle recipe would complete successfully.

Signed-off-by: ngutzmann <nathangutzm...@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle-2.7.1/CVE-2015-8803_8805.patch | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle-2.7.1/CVE-2015-8803_8805.patch 
b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle-2.7.1/CVE-2015-8803_8805.patch
index 1c4b9a9..a956f42 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle-2.7.1/CVE-2015-8803_8805.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/nettle/nettle-2.7.1/CVE-2015-8803_8805.patch
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Index: nettle-2.7.1/ecc-256.c
        u1 -= cy;
 -      u1 += cnd_add_n (t, rp + n - 4, ecc->p, 3);
 +
-+      cy = cnd_add_n (t, rp + n - 4, p->m, 2);
++      cy = cnd_add_n (t, rp + n - 4, ecc->p, 2);
 +      u0 += cy;
 +      u1 += (u0 < cy);
        u1 -= (-t) & 0xffffffff;
-- 
2.1.0

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to