On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 16:10 +0800, guojian.z...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Guojian Zhou <guojian.z...@windriver.com> > > The vendor proprietary rpms should be packaged into the > "vendor_proprietary_extensions" directory. Add the > "PACKAGE_VENDOR_REPO" > to allow the recipes select the required packages directory. > > Signed-off-by: Guojian Zhou <guojian.z...@windriver.com> > --- > meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Why isn't the "vendor extension" just a normal extra package architecture? For example, meta-intel was able to define a specific graphics package architecture for a subset of packages quite easily without this kind of change. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
