On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 03/01/2016 04:58 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> The failing patch is applied only when musl is in use (and so the >>> regression >>> went unnoticed). Can you rework it so that it can be applied >>> unconditionally? >> >> >> This probably could be however OE-Core supports musl and poky-tiny >> defaults to it. It will be good to test >> changes for it when changing OE-Core at the least bitbake -cpatch <recipe> > > > Yes, but that's a job for autobuilder,
There is a musl job on autobuilder. Not sure if its run daily. Ross ? I'm afraid. When doing local changes, > I have to draw the line somewhere about what I test, and what I don't, and > testing builds against various libc providers is outside of that. Thats good to please mention that in your patch submissions especially when you touch a recipe which is using such overrides for anything so maintainers know testing it has received. > > Generally, patches should be unconditional, because a) we should be able to > send them upstream, b) conditional patches create several slightly different > versions of source code, which is a maintenance headache. > We understand that, sometimes its not possible. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
