Naming these as "optional arguments" is perhaps slightly confusing since
some of the positional arguments might also be optional; in addition
it's rare (though possible) for options to be mandatory - up until
recently we had a recipetool option (-o) that was mandatory. It's not
perfect, but change it to "options" so it's at least a bit more
appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>
---
 scripts/lib/argparse_oe.py | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/lib/argparse_oe.py b/scripts/lib/argparse_oe.py
index 744cfe3..bf3ebad 100644
--- a/scripts/lib/argparse_oe.py
+++ b/scripts/lib/argparse_oe.py
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ class ArgumentSubParser(ArgumentParser):
         if 'order' in kwargs:
             self._order = kwargs.pop('order')
         super(ArgumentSubParser, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
+        for agroup in self._action_groups:
+            if agroup.title == 'optional arguments':
+                agroup.title = 'options'
+                break
 
     def parse_known_args(self, args=None, namespace=None):
         # This works around argparse not handling optional positional 
arguments being
-- 
2.5.0

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to