> On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 at 12:53:01 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 9 February 2016 at 11:31, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >>> -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=0f060c30a27922ce9c0d557a639b4fa3 >>> \ +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >>> "file://LICENSE;md5=e548d28737289d75a8f1e01ba2fd7825 \ >> >> Why did the license checksum change? > > Because the LICENSE file now contains one more entry for nios2, which changed > the checksum of the whole file. Maybe we should trim the checksum to use only > the header in the LICENSE file and not the whole file to prevent this ? > > This is the change which triggered the change of the checksum: > > +diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE > +index 3147094..a06fdcc 100644 > +--- a/LICENSE > ++++ b/LICENSE > +@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ compiler.h > + arch/s390.h > + uatomic/alpha.h > + uatomic/mips.h > ++uatomic/nios2.h
I don’t know how the LICENSE file looks like but including file names in license file is probably worth ignoring in checksums. > + uatomic/s390.h > + system.h > + > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
