On 02/08/2016 10:22 AM, Joshua G Lock wrote: > On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 22:43 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 11:55 -0800, Armin Kuster wrote: >>> From: Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com> >>> >>> WARNING: QA Issue: glibc-locale: /glibc-binary-localedata-sd >>> -in/usr/lib/locale/sd_IN/LC_CTYPE is owned by uid 1000, which is >>> the >>> same as the user running bitbake. This may be due to host >>> contamination [host-user-contaminated] >>> >>> fix type >>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akus...@mvista.com> >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-locale.inc | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Enough is enough. >> >> I cannot tell whether these patches are in master or not or whether >> master needs them or not. Master needs this one, its not in master, >> its >> only being proposed for jethro. Its a mess. >> >> I am therefore not taking any more stable branch patches at all until >> we amend the stable branch rules to state that pull requests and >> patches clearly state which branches need a fix, or clearly state why >> they don't. > > I made an attempt at starting to documenting that requirement: > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=Stable_branch_mainte > nance&diff=17480&oldid=17028 > > 'Patches' welcome.
Does this belong on the Yocto Project or OpenEmbedded wikis? Hunting both is getting annoying. Philip > > Regards, > > Joshua > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
