> On Feb 8, 2016, at 7:03 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 21:25, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoer...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This is more of a "FYI", but I've noticed that the build time of my chromium >>> recipe has gone from ~45 minutes to ~2h15m when the only thing that changes >>> is to move openembedded-core from the commit just before upgrading binutils >>> to version 2.26 ([fd75637] native.bbclass: Set CXXFLAGS from BUILD_CXXFLAGS >>> not BUILD_CFLAGS) to the one immediately after ([86ade2c] binutils: Upgrade >>> to 2.26). >> Is it using gold linker ? if not can you try both bfd and gold > > A week or so ago, as part of something else (but before the binutils update > to 2.26), I tried performing a clean build using the gold linker. > Unfortunately that image was not able to boot: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/2016-January/003697.html > (but there were no replies)
it might fix both issues for you in best case. > > It dies somewhere between the EFI bootloader and grub2 (or perhaps just after > grub starts). There's no grub output. > > I'll try doing the build with the gold linker, but the results of that build > might not be useful to me. Thats ok. Its for narrowing ld issues which is build time right now. > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
